NIS2 gap analysis with the policy attached — ISO 27001 via SIS in the loop
Your CISO uploads the company's information-security policy and asks for a NIS2 Article 21 gap analysis. The server-enforced workflow pairs every Art. 21(2) measure…
Each of these is a real run through the Ansvar gateway — the scenario, the cited answer, the source trail, and the downloadable artifact. Pick the one closest to your problem.
Your CISO uploads the company's information-security policy and asks for a NIS2 Article 21 gap analysis. The server-enforced workflow pairs every Art. 21(2) measure…
Your CISO needs to know how today's information-security policy maps against ISO 27001, NIS2, and DORA — without buying three separate audits.
Your HR team wants to roll out 'PeopleFlow', a US SaaS that processes payroll, performance reviews, absence data including medical certificates, and runs a 'flight-…
You are bidding on a Swedish public-sector tender. Selection criteria, award criteria, and mandatory contract clauses must align with Lagen om offentlig upphandling…
You are designing a new B2B authentication flow using OAuth 2.1 + OIDC + Keycloak. Your security architect wants a fast STRIDE narrative grounded in OWASP and STRID…
You are building a credit-scoring AI for three EU markets. This run resolves the EU AI Act's harmonised high-risk classification from fetched article text — Article…
Your counsel or DPO needs a defensible review of the company's data-retention policy — every finding pinned to the exact paragraph it concerns, hash-anchored so it…
An ISO/IEC 27001:2022-certified company must report security posture to its US parent on NIST CSF 2.0. Instead of maintaining a hand-built mapping spreadsheet, the…
You are adding a new customer-data warehouse. The privacy team wants a LINDDUN-go privacy threat model: linkability, identifiability, non-repudiation, detectability…
Your team is rolling out a productivity-monitoring tool to staff in the Netherlands, Germany, and France. Each jurisdiction has its own works-council and labour-cod…
Five complete deliverables, published unsigned so you can judge the work exactly as it leaves the engine — every linked citation fetched during the run, every gap marked. All five are fictional samples and say so.
Nine threats across four trust boundaries, control mapping, CRA duties — with unresolved rows held for review.
Screening, necessity, a seven-risk register, Art. 32 safeguards, and an honest Art. 36 prior-consultation call.
Requirements mapped to evidence, gaps flagged with regulatory basis, owners and remediation sequenced.
Role test, high-risk classification, and the article-level obligation register that follows from it.
CRA-era deferral records over a scanner export: engine scores, credited controls, live-fetched pin-cites, the investment plan — and a VEX back into Dependency-Track.
The Art. 21 measure list as a working register — XLSX and PDF, no sign-up.
Article 35 screening with WP248 criteria, processing description, risk register, Art. 36 check.
Six questions, client-side only — see which way the cited provisions point for your system.
Bring your own documents and scope. We run it end-to-end — every finding cited and validated by the expert who delivers it.