Do you cover the EU procurement directive directly?

Procurement questions are grounded in the national statute that transposes the directive — Sweden's LOU/LUF and the Netherlands' Aanbestedingswet — at provision level, with case law and preparatory works on Premium and above. That is what a review board actually cites.

Is this only Sweden and the Netherlands?

Procurement statute is searchable across the audited jurisdictions, but dedicated depth — case law, preparatory works, and the tender review and audit workflows — is built for Sweden and the Netherlands today, with more on the roadmap.

Sector · Public sector

Public sector

Test a tender — or your public-body AI duties — for lawfulness before someone else does.

Ansvar is a gateway for the AI assistant your team already uses — Claude, Microsoft Copilot, any MCP client. Connect it, and every answer below comes back cited to the provision or marked unresolved.

See full coverage

SE · NLprocurement law in depth

Art. 27public-body FRIA duty

Statutefree; case law on Premium and above

Public procurement and public-body duties, grounded in the statute that governs them. Swedish (LOU/LUF) and Dutch (Aanbestedingswet) procurement law sit at provision level — with case law and preparatory works on Premium and above — alongside the AI Act Art. 27 FRIA duty and the NIS2 obligations that land on public administrations.

what we cover

The law and standards we ground on

Law

National public-procurement law

Sweden (LOU/LUF) and Netherlands (Aanbestedingswet 2012) at statute level

GuidancePremium

Procurement case law & preparatory works

Sweden and Netherlands

Regulation

EU AI Act Art. 27 — public-body FRIA duty

Regulation

GDPR Art. 35 — public-body DPIA basis

Regulation

NIS2 (Dir (EU) 2022/2555) Art. 21 — public-administration security

what you can do

Workflows that turn it into evidence

Team

Public tender review (bidder-side)

a tender pack against procurement-law requirements with statute citations — Sweden (LOU) and Netherlands (Aw 2012) variants plus a jurisdiction-neutral base

Team

Public tender audit (buyer-side)

scan your own tender for unlawful selection, award or exclusion criteria — Sweden and Netherlands variants

Team

AI Act FRIA — Art. 27

the public-body deployer fundamental-rights impact assessment, with a Sweden variant

Team

Regulatory gap analysis

including NIS2 Art. 21 for public-administration entities

Team

DPIA — GDPR Art. 35

with Germany and Sweden variants

Team

Document review, paragraph-cited

public-sector policies, contracts and tender packs

Threat-model workflows run on Premium and above (5 runs a month on a system you describe); document-grounded workflows run on Team and Company. Every tier runs the same corpora as cited research inside your own AI client.

Questions buyers ask first

Do you cover the EU procurement directive directly?: Procurement questions are grounded in the national statute that transposes the directive — Sweden's LOU/LUF and the Netherlands' Aanbestedingswet — at provision level, with case law and preparatory works on Premium and above. That is what a review board actually cites.
Is this only Sweden and the Netherlands?: Procurement statute is searchable across the audited jurisdictions, but dedicated depth — case law, preparatory works, and the tender review and audit workflows — is built for Sweden and the Netherlands today, with more on the roadmap.

Run it against your own systems

Connect the AI client you already use and ask your first cited question — Free, Solo, Premium and Team are self-serve.

Setup guide

Building public sector compliance? It works today — we take on a few design partners per sector to tune it to your team.