Do you cover the EU procurement directive directly?

Procurement questions are grounded in the national statute that transposes the directive — Sweden's LOU/LUF and the Netherlands' Aanbestedingswet — at provision level, with case law and preparatory works on Premium and above. That is what a review board actually cites.

Is this only Sweden and the Netherlands?

For the tender review and audit workflows, yes — that depth, with case law and preparatory works, is built for Sweden and the Netherlands today. The corpus itself reaches further: procurement statute is searchable across the audited jurisdictions, the US Federal Acquisition Regulation and the OMB Uniform Guidance are served from the eCFR, and Dutch public bodies also get the BIO2 security baseline, the building code, the civil-protection stack and the police layer at provision level.

Sector · Public sector

Public sector

Test a tender — or your public-body AI duties — for lawfulness before someone else does.

Ansvar is a gateway for the AI assistant your team already uses — Claude, Microsoft Copilot, any MCP client. Connect it, and every answer below comes back cited to the provision or marked unresolved.

See full coverage

SE · NLprocurement law in depth

Art. 27public-body FRIA duty

FAR · 2 CFRUS procurement + Uniform Guidance

Public procurement and public-body duties, grounded in the statute that governs them. Swedish (LOU/LUF) and Dutch (Aanbestedingswet) procurement law sit at provision level — with case law and preparatory works on Premium and above — alongside the AI Act Art. 27 FRIA duty and the NIS2 obligations that land on public administrations. The US federal layer is served too: the Federal Acquisition Regulation and the OMB Uniform Guidance that governs every federal grant recipient, plus the education, housing, emergency-management and immigration codes. For Dutch public bodies the BIO2 government security baseline is served verbatim from its Staatscourant publication.

what we cover

The law and standards we ground on

Law

National public-procurement law

Sweden (LOU/LUF) and Netherlands (Aanbestedingswet 2012) at statute level

GuidancePremium

Procurement case law & preparatory works

Sweden and Netherlands

Regulation

US federal procurement — the Federal Acquisition Regulation (48 CFR)

served verbatim from the eCFR, with the OMB Uniform Guidance (2 CFR Part 200) that governs cost principles, audit and administration for every federal grant recipient

Regulation

US federal public-administration regulation

education (34 CFR — FERPA, Title IX, Section 504, IDEA), housing (24 CFR — HUD), emergency management (44 CFR — FEMA) and immigration (8 CFR — incl. I-9 / E-Verify), each served verbatim from the eCFR

Standard

Dutch government security baseline — BIO2 v1.3

served verbatim from its Staatscourant publication: the BIO2-kader and every Deel 2 measure, keyed to its ISO/IEC 27002:2022 control number and marked Cbw-verplicht or outside Cbw scope

Law

Dutch public-body statute — building code, civil protection and law enforcement

the national building-code rules, the emergency-preparedness stack (IJenV, NCTV) and the police layer (Politiewet, Wpg, BOA, OM aanwijzingen)

Regulation

EU AI Act Art. 27 — public-body FRIA duty

Regulation

GDPR Art. 35 — public-body DPIA basis

Regulation

NIS2 (Dir (EU) 2022/2555) Art. 21 — public-administration security

what you can do

Workflows that turn it into evidence

Team

Public tender review (bidder-side)

a tender pack against procurement-law requirements with statute citations — Sweden (LOU) and Netherlands (Aw 2012) variants plus a jurisdiction-neutral base

Team

Public tender audit (buyer-side)

scan your own tender for unlawful selection, award or exclusion criteria — Sweden and Netherlands variants

Team

AI Act FRIA — Art. 27

the public-body deployer fundamental-rights impact assessment, with a Sweden variant

Team

Regulatory gap analysis

including NIS2 Art. 21 for public-administration entities and, for Dutch bodies, the BIO2 measures at their ISO/IEC 27002 control numbers

Team

DPIA — GDPR Art. 35

with Germany and Sweden variants

Team

Document review, paragraph-cited

public-sector policies, contracts and tender packs

STRIDE threat-model workflows run on every plan against a system you describe — 1 run a month on Free, 2 on Solo, 5 on Premium, which also adds the LINDDUN and TARA families, the rendered reports, and case law inside the run. Document-grounded workflows run on Team and Company. Every tier runs the same corpora as cited research inside your own AI client.

Questions buyers ask first

Do you cover the EU procurement directive directly?: Procurement questions are grounded in the national statute that transposes the directive — Sweden's LOU/LUF and the Netherlands' Aanbestedingswet — at provision level, with case law and preparatory works on Premium and above. That is what a review board actually cites.
Is this only Sweden and the Netherlands?: For the tender review and audit workflows, yes — that depth, with case law and preparatory works, is built for Sweden and the Netherlands today. The corpus itself reaches further: procurement statute is searchable across the audited jurisdictions, the US Federal Acquisition Regulation and the OMB Uniform Guidance are served from the eCFR, and Dutch public bodies also get the BIO2 security baseline, the building code, the civil-protection stack and the police layer at provision level.

Run it against your own systems

Connect the AI client you already use and ask your first cited question — Free, Solo, Premium and Team are self-serve.

Setup guide

Building public sector compliance? It works today — we take on a few design partners per sector to tune it to your team.