No tracking. No cookie wall.·100 % EU-hosted on Hetzner
Sector · Privacy

Privacy & data protection

Data protection that grounds every answer in the article, then turns it into evidence.

Ansvar is a gateway for the AI assistant your team already uses — Claude, Microsoft Copilot, any MCP client. Connect it, and every answer below comes back cited to the provision or marked unresolved.

99GDPR articles, addressable
7privacy & DP workflows
doc://paragraph-level citations

Privacy is the gateway's deepest workflow lane. Ask a question and the answer comes from the GDPR article itself — then the same corpus runs your DPIA, privacy threat model, or contract review and returns each finding cited to the provision it rests on.

what we cover

The law and standards we ground on

Regulation

GDPR (Reg (EU) 2016/679)

full article-level, recitals included

Regulation

ePrivacy Directive (2002/58/EC)

Regulation

Law Enforcement Directive (EU) 2016/680

Regulation

GDPR Art. 22 — automated individual decision-making

plus the EU AI Act intersection for AI-driven decisions

Law

National GDPR-implementation statutes

audited GREEN set — see /coverage for the live jurisdiction footprint

GuidancePremium

Case-law fan-out where licensing permits

arrives inside search on paid tiers

what you can do

Workflows that turn it into evidence

DPIA — GDPR Art. 35

with Germany (BDSG) and Sweden (IMY) variants; drives Art. 36 prior-consultation and severity × likelihood scoring

LINDDUN privacy threat model

systematic privacy-threat elicitation over your data-flow diagram

Document review, paragraph-cited

a privacy notice, DPA, RoPA or processor contract against GDPR, each finding anchored to a doc:// segment

GDPR gap analysis

cited gap register with PDF / CSV / GRC-import export

STRIDE threat model for Art. 32 TOMs

security-of-processing measures evidenced against the article

FRIA — EU AI Act Art. 27

for AI systems processing personal data

assembledTeam

National-divergence & transfer analysis

cross-jurisdiction comparison, legitimate-interest balancing (Art. 6(1)(f)), Chapter V transfers — assembled from cited research

Workflows run on Team and Company. Free & Premium run the same corpora as cited research inside your own AI client.

Questions buyers ask first

Do you store our documents or personal data?
No. Your AI client connects to the gateway and the corpora answer source-scoped questions; the MCP servers store no client data. Uploaded documents you review are held under your own tenant and cited by segment hash.
Is the case law in the answer reliable?
Case law arrives through premium fan-out only where the source licensing permits it, and every hit is cited to the deciding body. Where no licensed case-law source covers a point, the answer says so rather than inventing one.
Which national data-protection laws are covered?
The EU-level GDPR text is on every tier. National implementation statutes are covered for the audited GREEN jurisdictions listed on /coverage. National DPA enforcement decisions are out of scope where their licensing does not permit redistribution.

Run it against your own systems

Connect the AI client you already use and ask your first cited question — Free, Premium and Team are self-serve.

Building privacy compliance? It works today — we take on a few design partners per sector to fine-tune it to your team.