Do you serve the ISO 10218 or ISO/TS 15066 text?

Not by default — robot-safety standards are surfaced as clause maps with Ansvar-authored cross-references, addressable against your licensed copy. But the standard text itself can be added: through the SIS-licensed standards module, any ISO, EN or SS standard SIS publishes can be licensed in and served cited verbatim inside your workflows; see /standards. The ROS 2 / DDS security guidance and the robot exploitation catalog are served full-text — both are Apache-2.0 licensed.

Can this certify a robot cell under the Machinery Regulation?

No. The workflows produce cited gap analyses and a TARA — decision-support for your conformity work, not a conformity verdict or a notified-body assessment.

How is this different from the Industrial / OT page?

Industrial / OT takes the plant operator's view — zones, conduits and live ICS advisories. This lane takes the robot maker's and integrator's view: cell-level safety clause maps, Machinery Regulation conformity duties, and the security of the robot stack itself. The IEC 62443 mapping is shared between both.

Sector · Robotics

Robotics & automation

Robot-cell safety, Machinery Regulation conformity, and robot-stack security — cited at clause and article level.

Ansvar is a gateway for the AI assistant your team already uses — Claude, Microsoft Copilot, any MCP client. Connect it, and every answer below comes back cited to the provision or marked unresolved.

See full coverage

10218:2025clause map + ISO/TS 15066

ROS 2 / DDSsecurity guidance, full text

Freethe EU regulations, every tier

ISO 10218-1/-2:2025 and ISO/TS 15066 collaborative modes are surfaced as clause maps with Ansvar cross-references — never the reproduced standard — alongside the EU Machinery Regulation and the AI Act duties on AI safety components at article level. The robot stack itself is covered full-text: ROS 2 / DDS security guidance and robot exploitation chains (both Apache-2.0), bridged to IEC 62443 industrial cyber. Ask the requirement; then run the robot TARA or machinery gap analysis that turns it into evidence.

what we cover

The law and standards we ground on

Regulation

Machinery Regulation (EU) 2023/1230

article-level, incl. Annex III essential H&S (applies 2027-01-20)

Regulation

EU AI Act — high-risk safety-component duties (Reg (EU) 2024/1689)

Standard

Control mapping: ISO 10218-1/-2:2025 + ISO/TS 15066 collaborative operation

robot & robot-cell clause map + Ansvar cross-refs — not the standard text

Standard

Control mapping: functional safety (ISO 12100 · ISO 13849) + IEC 62443 industrial cyber

requirement mapping incl. the safety-security bridge — not the standard text

Guidance

ROS 2 / DDS security + robot exploitation chains

served full-text (Apache-2.0) — robot-stack hardening and attack techniques, cited per item

Regulation

Horizontal: Cyber Resilience Act · NIS2

what you can do

Workflows that turn it into evidence

Premium

Robot / cobot TARA

threat analysis & risk assessment off the robot TARA workflow, grounded in the ISO 10218 / safety-security-bridge clause map — an available analysis, not a legally-assured verdict

Team

EU Machinery Regulation gap analysis

Annex III essential-H&S coverage incl. the conformity route — a gap analysis, never a conformity verdict

Premium

STRIDE threat model

over the robot controller, ROS 2 graph, fleet manager and cloud backend

Team

AI Act gap analysis & classification

high-risk safety-component duties for AI in robots (Art. 6(1))

assembledPremium

Robot-stack security research as cited answers

ROS 2 / DDS hardening and robot exploitation chains, every answer cited to its source

Team

Document review, paragraph-cited

risk assessments, technical documentation and integration specs

Threat-model workflows run on Premium and above (5 runs a month on a system you describe); document-grounded workflows run on Team and Company. Every tier runs the same corpora as cited research inside your own AI client.

Questions buyers ask first

Do you serve the ISO 10218 or ISO/TS 15066 text?: Not by default — robot-safety standards are surfaced as clause maps with Ansvar-authored cross-references, addressable against your licensed copy. But the standard text itself can be added: through the SIS-licensed standards module, any ISO, EN or SS standard SIS publishes can be licensed in and served cited verbatim inside your workflows; see /standards. The ROS 2 / DDS security guidance and the robot exploitation catalog are served full-text — both are Apache-2.0 licensed.
Can this certify a robot cell under the Machinery Regulation?: No. The workflows produce cited gap analyses and a TARA — decision-support for your conformity work, not a conformity verdict or a notified-body assessment.
How is this different from the Industrial / OT page?: Industrial / OT takes the plant operator's view — zones, conduits and live ICS advisories. This lane takes the robot maker's and integrator's view: cell-level safety clause maps, Machinery Regulation conformity duties, and the security of the robot stack itself. The IEC 62443 mapping is shared between both.

Run it against your own systems

Connect the AI client you already use and ask your first cited question — Free, Solo, Premium and Team are self-serve.

Setup guide

Building robotics compliance? It works today — we take on a few design partners per sector to tune it to your team.