Regulation
EU AI Act (Reg (EU) 2024/1689)
full article-level, incl. annexes, definitions & recitals
Sector · AI governance
AI governance
Classify the system, map the obligations, and ground every duty in the article of the AI Act.
Ansvar is a gateway for the AI assistant your team already uses — Claude, Microsoft Copilot, any MCP client. Connect it, and every answer below comes back cited to the provision or marked unresolved.
FullAI Act, article-level
Art. 6high-risk test + Annex III
Freethe whole Act, every tier
The full EU AI Act, article by article — prohibited practices, the high-risk test, provider and deployer duties, conformity assessment, GPAI. The deadlines are live: GPAI duties have applied since 2 August 2025, the Article 50 transparency duties apply from 2 August 2026, and the high-risk regime — postponed by the June 2026 omnibus — applies from 2 December 2027 (Annex III) and 2 August 2028 (Annex I embedded). Ask where your system lands and get the provision; then run the readiness gap analysis that turns it into an obligation register.
what we cover
The law and standards we ground on
Regulation
Risk classification — prohibited practices (Art. 5), high-risk (Art. 6 + Annex III)
Regulation
Role duties — provider (Art. 16), deployer (Art. 26), FRIA (Art. 27), conformity (Art. 43)
Regulation
GPAI & systemic-risk model provisions (Art. 51–55)
Regulation
GDPR intersection — automated decisions (Art. 22), DPIA trigger (Art. 35)
GuidancePremium
EU AI Office guidance
Standard
ISO/IEC 42001 — AI management systems
the standard text itself, cited verbatim, as the SIS-licensed add-on — one of five live standards (/standards)
what you can do
Workflows that turn it into evidence
AI Act readiness & gap analysis
classify the role (provider / deployer / importer / distributor), map it to obligations, and produce a per-obligation gap register
FRIA — EU AI Act Art. 27
the deployer fundamental-rights impact assessment, with a Sweden variant
DPIA for AI systems processing personal data
GDPR Art. 35, with Germany and Sweden variants
STRIDE threat model of the AI system
over your architecture and data-flow diagram
Document review, paragraph-cited
model cards, technical documentation and AI-governance policies against the Act
assembledPremium
Role & obligation classification as cited research
free single-jurisdiction search; premium adds AI Office guidance — also delivered as the senior-reviewed AI Act Readiness assessment
Threat-model workflows run on Premium and above (5 runs a month on a system you describe); document-grounded workflows run on Team and Company. Every tier runs the same corpora as cited research inside your own AI client.
Questions buyers ask first
- Do you classify our system as high-risk for us?
- The workflow grounds the classification in Art. 5, Art. 6 and Annex III and shows the reasoning cited to the Act. The legal call stays yours, or our senior-reviewed AI Act Readiness service makes it — there is no one-click 'high-risk' verdict.
- Is the AI Act transposed differently per country?
- No. The AI Act is an EU Regulation with direct effect — there is no national transposition to track. National measures concern enforcement authorities and a few narrow derogations, not the obligations themselves.
- When do the AI Act obligations actually apply?
- In stages: prohibited practices and AI-literacy duties since 2 February 2025, GPAI obligations since 2 August 2025, and the Article 50 transparency duties from 2 August 2026. The high-risk regime was postponed by the June 2026 omnibus: stand-alone Annex III systems apply from 2 December 2027 and Annex I embedded systems from 2 August 2028. The corpus serves the full Act today, so you can build the obligation register before your date lands.
Run it against your own systems
Connect the AI client you already use and ask your first cited question — Free, Solo, Premium and Team are self-serve.
Building ai governance compliance? It works today — we take on a few design partners per sector to tune it to your team.