No tracking. No cookie wall.·EU-hosted (Hetzner) · Cloudflare edge under SCCs
Sector · Automotive

Automotive

Make your TARA — and your CSMS evidence — hold up to UN R155 type approval.

Ansvar is a gateway for the AI assistant your team already uses — Claude, Microsoft Copilot, any MCP client. Connect it, and every answer below comes back cited to the provision or marked unresolved.

R155 · R156provision-level
ISO 21434clause map + cross-refs
TARAthreat analysis & risk assessment

Vehicle cybersecurity grounded in the regulations and standards that gate type approval. UN R155 and R156 are addressable provision by provision, with ISO/SAE 21434 and the diagnostic standards surfaced as clause maps and Ansvar cross-references — never the standard text. Run the TARA, the CSMS gap, or an ECU effective-risk pass and cite every finding.

what we cover

The law and standards we ground on

Regulation

UN R155 (cybersecurity) · UN R156 (software update)

addressable provision-level

Standard

Control mapping: ISO/SAE 21434

requirement mapping + cross-references — the ISO/SAE 21434 text itself is available as the SIS-licensed add-on (/standards)

Standard

Control mapping: UDS · DoIP · SOVD · AUTOSAR diagnostics

clause mapping, not the standard text

Regulation

Repair & maintenance information access — RMI / SERMI

Reg (EU) 2018/858

Regulation

Horizontal: Cyber Resilience Act · GDPR (connected-vehicle data)

what you can do

Workflows that turn it into evidence

assembledPremium

Vehicle threat model & TARA

ISO/SAE 21434 over the ECU and asset model — an available analysis, not a type-approval verdict

UN R155 CSMS gap analysis

cybersecurity-management-system evidence for type approval

UN R156 software-update gap analysis

SUMS evidence for software-update management

Effective-risk CVE rescoring

re-rank ECU and component vulnerabilities with CISA KEV / EPSS context — never exploit code

Document review, paragraph-cited

TARA reports and CSMS/SUMS evidence packs against R155/R156

Threat-model workflows run on Premium and above (5 runs a month on a system you describe); document-grounded workflows run on Team and Company. Every tier runs the same corpora as cited research inside your own AI client.

Questions buyers ask first

Do you give us the ISO/SAE 21434 text?
By default, ISO/SAE 21434 and the diagnostic standards are surfaced as requirement and clause mappings with Ansvar cross-references, not the reproduced standard. But the ISO/SAE 21434 text itself — licensed and cited verbatim inside your workflows — is available as the SIS-licensed standards add-on, one of the five standards live today; see /standards. UN R155 and R156 are the regulations, addressable provision by provision.
Does this produce a type-approval verdict?
No. The TARA and CSMS/SUMS gap analyses are decision-support — cited evidence you take into the type-approval process, not the approval itself.

Run it against your own systems

Connect the AI client you already use and ask your first cited question — Free, Solo, Premium and Team are self-serve.

Setup guide

Building automotive compliance? It works today — we take on a few design partners per sector to tune it to your team.