Living Architecture

How Living Architecture answers a security warning for your own systems: the map, the evidence, the answer, and a proposed three-week pilot.

The problem: A new security flaw is announced. Is your business affected?

Your team needs to know what software is running, whether an attacker can reach it, and who owns the system. Those facts are scattered across documents, tools and people.

The map: Living Architecture keeps a map of your systems.

A map of your systems, their connections and the evidence behind each fact. Your own AI assistant uses that map, plus reference information from Ansvar, to investigate a risk and explain its answer.

The answer: One warning, answered for your systems.

This flaw lets an attacker hide a second request inside the first. It matters only if the proxy reuses its connections to the website. The owner confirms that fact, then the route and evidence are checked.

It stays current: The map stays useful as your systems change.

Approved changes keep your map current, and the threat models that depend on a change are marked out of date. Re-checking them automatically is the planned next step.

Your control and your data: Your team stays in control.

Read-only sources, approval before map changes, and clear boundaries for your data.

Plan a pilot: Start with one system.

Proposed pilot shape: one system, one owner, three weeks.